MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

POPUP: an observational digital study reporting general population norms for the EQ-5D-5-L and HUI-3 in 8 countries

2025· other· en· W6921570714 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueFigshare · 2025
Typeother
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicDiverse Scientific and Economic Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDimension (graph theory)PopulationObservational studyData collectionUtility theoryGeneral linear model

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background This study aimed to estimate population norms in the US, Canada, UK, Italy, Spain, Germany, The Netherlands, and Belgium for the EQ-5D-5-L with six bolt-on dimensions (vision, breathing, tiredness, sleep, social relationships, self-confidence), and for the Health Utilities Index-Mark 3 (HUI-3). Methods A digital study was conducted among 9,000 general population participants, representative of age, sex, education, and region within each country. Data collection included demographics, health conditions, EQ-5D-5-L and bolt-ons, and the HUI-3. National population norms were calculated for each dimension and for utility values. Testing for differences between subgroups was performed with a Generalized Linear Model. Results The proportion of respondents reporting severe-to-extreme problems at dimension level was highest on the EQ-5D-5-L dimensions pain/discomfort (5.5%) and anxiety/depression (5.6%), and on the HUI-3 dimensions pain (5.7%), emotion (5.4%), and cognition (4.1%). Severe-to-extreme problems on the EQ-5D-5-L bolt-on dimensions were social relationships (8.0%), sleep (7.6%), tiredness (7.4%), self-confidence (5.1%), vision (3.7%), and breathing (2.0%). Mean EQ-5D-5-L utility values for all countries combined displayed a U-shape by age and ranged between 0.819 and 0.871, whereas HUI-3 utility values ranged between 0.717 and 0.768 without a clear pattern. The impact of age by sex on EQ-5D-5-L utility values was country-specific. HUI-3 utilities did not show a linear trend by age, and no difference was found by sex. Italy had the highest mean EQ-5D-5-L utility values, while the Netherlands and Spain had the highest values according to the HUI-3. The lowest utility values were observed in the UK, for both instruments. Utility values differed significantly by education, employment, place of residence, needing a caregiver, being on sick leave and having health conditions such as dementia, MS, depression, rheumatoid arthritis, systemic lupus erythematosus and heart failure. Conclusions Important differences in reporting problems and in utility values were found between countries and subgroups, highlighting the need for country-specific population norms.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.017
Threshold uncertainty score0.034

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.004
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.260
GPT teacher head0.289
Teacher spread0.029 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFigshare→Same topicDiverse Scientific and Economic Studies→French-language works237,207→