Modeling microbiome-trait associations with taxonomy-adaptive neural networks
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract The human microbiome, a complex ecosystem of microorganisms inhabiting the body, plays a critical role in human health. Investigating its association with host traits is essential for understanding its impact on various diseases. Although shotgun metagenomic sequencing technologies have produced vast amounts of microbiome data, analyzing such data is highly challenging due to its sparsity, noisiness, and high feature dimensionality. Here, we develop MIOSTONE, an accurate and interpretable neural network model for microbiome-disease association that simulates a real taxonomy by encoding the relationships among microbial features. The taxonomy-encoding architecture provides a natural bridge from variations in microbial taxa abundance to variations in traits, encompassing increasingly coarse scales from species to domains. MIOSTONE has the ability to determine whether taxa within the corresponding taxonomic group provide a better explanation in a data-driven manner. MIOSTONE serves as an effective predictive model, as it not only accurately predicts microbiome-trait associations across extensive simulated and real datasets but also offers interpretability for scientific discovery. Both attributes are crucial for facilitating in silico investigations into the biological mechanisms underlying such associations among microbial taxa. Video Abstract
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.010 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".