Post Migration Mental Health Impacts of Drag Culture Participation among LGBTQ2I+ refugees in Canada
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Using Intersectional, Minority Stress, and Grounded theoretical principles, and a qualitative interview and quantitative survey approach, this studies examines the mental health impacts of participation in drag culture on LGBTQ2I+ refugees and forced migrants living in Canada. The findings demonstrate that LGBTQ2I+ refugees in Canada who interact with the drag community have increased positive mental health outcomes as a result of reduced avoidance of LGBTQ2I+ activities; increased exploration and performance of gender, sexual orientation; access to resources; sense of community; and improved confidence and sense of freedom. The results also demonstrated that more governmental and institutional supports are needed for LGBTQ2I+ immigrants in Canada to better navigate the immigration system and access education, jobs, and housing, in addition to an expansion of drag culture styles and ethnic, linguistic, and socioeconomic diversity in order to better welcome and accommodate queer individuals from other nations. Ultimately, this study aimed to bring greater insight into the mental health impacts of drag participation for LGBTQ2I+ refugees in Canada.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.012 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".