MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W6921870015 · doi:10.7910/dvn/litfvn

Penguatan local value chain: analisis pembiayaan hijau terhadap comparative trade CPO di Malaysia

2023· dataset· en· W6921870015 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueHarvard Dataverse · 2023
Typedataset
Languageen
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDistributed lagConsumption (sociology)Quarter (Canadian coin)Production (economics)Value (mathematics)Variable (mathematics)Variables

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This study examines the comparative dysfunction of palm oil in local CPO commodities in Malaysia through green economic structures and strengthening local value chains. The green economy structure variables discussed in this study, namely green financing and local value chain variables in CPO exports, are measured by CPO products' price and CPO production's value. In addition to these variables, household consumption expenditure is the control variable used as a variable affecting the level of CPO exports. The research data uses data from the first quarter of 2013 to the fourth quarter of 2022. This research methodology describes the Autoregressive Distributed Lag (ARDL) model to examine the long-term effect between variables and the Error Correction Model (ECM) to see how quickly the economy returns to a balanced condition when there are short-term shocks. The study results show that the long-term correlation between the variables of green financing, the price of CPO products, and the value of CPO production significantly affects the level of CPO exports. However, the household consumption expenditure variable is insignificant to the level of CPO exports in the long run. Thus, the short-term correlation shows that green financing variables, CPO product prices, CPO production values, and household consumption expenditures significantly affect CPO export levels.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Dataset · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.027
Threshold uncertainty score0.053

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0040.010
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.039
GPT teacher head0.289
Teacher spread0.250 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreDataset

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHarvard Dataverse→French-language works237,207→