Planning for recreation on public lands: an examination of the Livingstone River
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The Livingstone River Valley (LRV) is an area of public land in Southwest Alberta that is experiencing increasing pressures from recreational and other uses.Little information exists about recreational users to inform future planning processes.This project included investigation of recreational users in the LRV and of the planning process for recreation management on public land in Alberta.Detailed socio-demographic information on recreational users of the LRV was collected using a traffic intercept survey method in summer 2003 and 2004.Three regionally relevant precedents were reviewed to investigate the recreation planning process.Based on these investigations and a literature review on recreation management and planning theory, two recommendations are provided.First, a new comprehensive planning process for recreation management is recommended.Second, it is recommended to use information collected about recreational users to plan specifically for the needs of recreational users so that management actions will be more effective.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it