MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6922065163 · doi:10.7939/r3-my65-ft02

A Study for Leaching Synthetic Scheelite in H2SO4 And H2O2 Solution: An Investigation and Optimization

2023· dissertation· en· W6922065163 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueUniversity of Alberta Library · 2023
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMetal Extraction and Bioleaching
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsScheeliteLeaching (pedology)WolframiteTungstenResource recoveryExtractive metallurgy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Canada's 2021 Critical Minerals Strategy underscores the prominence of tungsten as a rare and critical element. Today, tungsten production relies on scheelite, categorized as a secondary resource due to its complex ore composition and lower-grade nature. This phenomenon stems from the depletion and utilization of high-grade wolframite reserves. In response to this context, the significance of synthetic scheelite has ascended, primarily due to its inherent advantages such as its low impurity content and enhanced accessibility, particularly in ongoing laboratory-based leaching investigations. The most recent advancements in laboratory-scale research have yielded a feasible and environment-friendly approach for leaching synthetic scheelite utilizing a mixed acid solution of H2SO4 and H2O2. This process is carried out under normal pressure and moderate temperatures. Despite this notable progress, there persists a dearth of comprehensive inquiries into this novel leaching method. Furthermore, a comparative analysis between processes involving natural and synthetic ores remains underexplored. This existing gap in the literature underscores the need for a collaborative endeavor to achieve a comprehensive understanding of the novel leaching technique and a rigorous evaluation of the possibilities for optimizing operational parameters. Ultimately, the objective is to offer valuable insights and enhancements concerning the utilization of reagents, thereby fostering a more efficient, economically viable, and environmentally sustainable leaching process. To achieve this, a promising 2-step method for scheelite leaching was explored, aiming to minimize the thermal decomposition of H2O2 and subsequently reduce its concentration. The results showed that the 2-step method is infeasible as it requires a longer reaction time compared to the synergistic leaching approach, resulting in reduced productivity and energy efficiency. Subsequently, a detailed investigation into the thermal decomposition process ensued, seeking to extract tungsten without compromising leaching efficiency. This was achieved by optimizing the operational conditions based on established literature for natural ore. The findings unveiled the potential for multiple recycling of lixivium, supplemented with depleted chemicals, thereby promoting an eco-friendly approach while reducing operational expenses. Notably, for an L/S (mL/g) ratio of 10, enhanced H2WO4 crystallization efficiency was achieved by optimizing the thermal decomposition duration, extended up to 6 hours. Moreover, experiments conducted without H2SO4 supplementation revealed the inherent optimization potential within the leaching system. Finally, optimization was undertaken in terms of reagent concentration, involving a reduction of H2SO4 concentration from 3 mol/L to 1 mol/L, an increase in temperature from 45°C to 60°C, and an additional 30-minute leaching duration. This collective effort culminated in proposing an environmentally conscious and cost-effective process for synthetic scheelite leaching in the solution of H2SO4 and H2O2.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.538
Threshold uncertainty score0.643

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.205
Teacher spread0.191 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUniversity of Alberta LibrarySame topicMetal Extraction and BioleachingFrench-language works237,207