MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Magnetic and Dielectric Loaded Miniaturized Ultra-Wide Band Spiral Antenna

2024· article· en· W6922110655 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAntenna Design and Analysis
Canadian institutionsMicrosemi (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSpiral antennaRadiation patternAntenna (radio)Frequency bandImpedance matchingPatch antennaMicrostrip antennaBalunMicrowaveMicrostrip

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The paper proposes a miniaturized Ultra-wide band Circularly Polarized Spiral Antenna for L/S/C/X/Ku-Band Interferometer based Direction Finding application. The spiral antenna utilizes a wide band microstrip balun to achieve impedance matching over multi-octave frequency band (1-18 GHz) by employing magnetic loading to absorb spurious radiation, achieving a Voltage Standing Wave Ratio (VSWR) less than 2:1. The antenna configuration incorporates a cavity structure to convert the Bi-directional radiation pattern to the Uni-directional radiation pattern. The cavity is loaded with a microwave absorber to suppress unwanted radiations, destructive interference between the backward waves and to absorb the back lobe, thereby achieving a symmetric radiation pattern with a good axial ratio of less than 2.5 dB over ultrawide bandwidth. Shaped dielectric loading is used on expanding outer spiral arms to improve the operational frequency bandwidth and the boresight radiation pattern at low frequency end. The simulated antenna performance was validated through measurement and is in good agreement with each other. The proposed design is a potential candidate for Direction Finding based on the Base Line Interferometer (BLI) technique for Electronic Warfare (EW) systems.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.191
Teacher spread0.185 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAntenna Design and AnalysisFrench-language works237,207