MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6922128193 · doi:10.11575/prism/40509

Online learning and teaching from kindergarten to graduate school

2022· other· en· W6922128193 on OpenAlexaffabout

Bibliographic record

VenuePRISM (University of Calgary) · 2022
Typeother
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicDiverse Scientific and Economic Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsVariety (cybernetics)Online learningDisciplineModalitiesEleventhOnline teachingHigher educationTeacher educationEducational technology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This volume is the product of the collaboration of invited participants and editors at the Eleventh Working Conference of the Canadian Association for Teacher Education that was held online with the University of Calgary from October 14–16, 2021. The impetus for the conference theme, online learning and teaching from kindergarten to graduate school, emerged alongside the worldwide pivot to online education in response to the global pandemic. This volume examines a variety of ways in which Canadian researchers in teacher education are analyzing, designing, and evaluating diverse online learning pedagogies, learner experiences and outcomes in K-12 and post-secondary education contexts. Chapters are organized in four sections: 1) Online Learning & Teaching in K-12, 2) Relationships & Relationality in Online Learning & Teaching, 3) Online Learning & Teaching in Higher Education, and 4) Conceptualizing Learner Centered Models in Higher Education. Knowledge building and collaboration through the working conference and the chapters in this publication aim to enhance and extend understanding, communication, and critical analysis among Canadian and global teacher educators; this publication also seeks to contribute to research and practice in response to the imperative that “teacher education programs must prepare teachers for the schools of the future – teachers who are experts in disciplinary content, knowledgeable about the latest research on how people learn, and able to respond creatively to support each student’s optimal learning” (Sawyer, 2022, p. 671) in diverse modalities and contexts for learning including online, blended, hybrid, and in person engagements.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.048
Threshold uncertainty score0.095

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0040.003
Scholarly communication0.0080.005
Open science0.0010.005
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0220.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.193
Teacher spread0.166 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2022
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePRISM (University of Calgary)Same topicDiverse Scientific and Economic StudiesFrench-language works237,207