MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6922230006 · doi:10.11575/prism/48936

BRACKISH - A Transdisciplinary Exploration of Water

2024· other· en· W6922230006 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueOpen MIND · 2024
Typeother
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEducation Methods and Technologies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBrackish waterSpace (punctuation)LiminalityEstuaryBrackish marshFaunaLimnology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Brackish water is chemically between fresh and saline and may come from mixing of fresh water with seawater where rivers flow into the ocean, from aquifers, or created by human activity. It’s intermediate and dynamic and is associated with some of the world’s most critical ecosystems like estuaries and mangroves. It can be hostile, but on the other hand, the flora and fauna that thrive in brackish water are adapted and versatile. BRACKISH asks, what invitations might the liminal brackish space extend to scholars, creatives, and community members who operate in interdisciplinary spaces? How can this unique coming together inspire us to engage with water through transdisciplinary research and creative practices? Each piece is a unique expression of interactions or relationships with water, but BRACKISH only exists when the individual works come together to share space in the galleries. Your engagement with the visuals, renderings, textures, sounds, and stories is the final element that brings BRACKISH to life and connects us all through the necessity of water. BRACKISH includes representation from the Faculty of Arts, the Faculty of Science, and the School of Architecture, Planning and Landscape, and features: ○ Eliza Housman ○ Karly Ross ○ Kulsum Fatima ○ Megan Leung ○ Traci Berg ○ Uchechukwu Peter Umezurike ○ Veronica Briseño Castrejon in collaboration with Haizel de la Cruz, Veronica Hoil Briseño, Pedro Uc Be, Josue Hoil Briseño, Azael Hoil Briseño, and the organizations: Suumil Móokt’aan with Valiana Aguilar and Angel Ku, Colectivo de comunidades Mayas de Hopelchen Campeche (Collective of Maya communities from Hopelchen Campeche), and Muuch Kaambal ○ April Neuhaus ○ Xue Yan Chan We are grateful to be able to host BRACKISH on the traditional territories of the Treaty 7 peoples and the home of Métis Nation of Alberta Districts 5 and 6. Connections with the landscapes that sustain, challenge, and inspire us flow through the works featured in BRACKISH. The projects that make up BRACKISH share diverse perspectives of water, creating space to think about how our encounters with water are shaped by our intersectional identities. We encourage you to consider your relationship to the natural world and offer gratitude to the Indigenous peoples who have tended to these spaces and places since time immemorial.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.430
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0280.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.188
GPT teacher head0.476
Teacher spread0.287 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it