MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6922234207 · doi:10.13096/rfre.v9n1.228

Étude mixte décrivant le portrait de la pratique d’ergothérapeutes québécois auprès des personnes présentant des symptômes comportementaux et psychologiques de la démence

2023· article· fr· W6922234207 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueDOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) · 2023
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEducation Methods and Technologies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPortraitPsychological interventionOccupational therapyTriangulationDescriptive research

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

But : La gestion des symptômes comportementaux et psychologiques reliés à la démence [SCPD] implique plusieurs professionnels, dont les ergothérapeutes. La pratique des ergothérapeutes québécois auprès des personnes âgées présentant des SCPD est, à ce jour, peu connue. L’objectif de cet article est de décrire la pratique d’ergothérapeutes québécois auprès des personnes présentant des SCPD dans les divers milieux de pratique. Méthodologie : Une recherche descriptive impliquant un devis mixte simultané avec triangulation comprenant un questionnaire en ligne et des entrevues semi-dirigées a été réalisée auprès d’ergothérapeutes québécois. Résultats : Les ergothérapeutes accordent une grande place à l’évaluation en ayant recours à des observations ou des mises en situation. Les interventions les plus fréquemment utilisées touchent les modifications de l’environnement. Conclusion : Les résultats de l’étude fournissent des pistes de réflexion utiles pour guider la pratique future des ergothérapeutes. --- Aim: The management of behavioural and psychological symptoms related to dementia [BPSD] involves several professionals, including occupational therapists. To date, the practice of occupational therapists in Quebec with elderly people with BPSD is poorly documented. The purpose of this article is to draw a portrait of the practice of occupational therapists in Quebec with people with BPSD. Methodology: A descriptive research with simultaneous mixed-mode design with triangulation, including an online questionnaire and semi-structured interviews, was conducted with Quebec occupational therapists. Results: Occupational therapists report that they place a great deal of emphasis on the assessment of abilities through observation. The most frequently used interventions involve environmental modification. Conclusion: Study findings provide useful insights for guiding practice of occupational therapists.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.008
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.597
Threshold uncertainty score0.802

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.008
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0030.002
Scholarly communication0.0030.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.274
GPT teacher head0.609
Teacher spread0.335 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)Same topicEducation Methods and TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207