Mikrocensus 1993, 2. quarter: Equipment of Households
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This Mikrozensus special survey contains questions on the equipment of households with electric appliances, and the disposal of old electric appliances, environmental conditions of housing and the need of repair of the apartment, the existence of holiday apartments, new purchases (within the last two years), social-statistical data, the existence of vehicles (new purchases and the disposal of the old vehicle) and season tickets for public transport, indicators for holiday- and spare time habits, financial backup and the net income of all persons (except those who are self-employed or help in the family business). The survey mainly follows the Mikrozensus survey from June 1979 (Mikrozensus MZ7902), June 1984 ( Mikrozensus MZ8402 ) and June 1989 (Mikrozensus MZ8902).The survey offers the possibility to gather information on the material living conditions of the Austrian population (and their change over time). Especially important is the connection of the indicators for standard of living and the household income. New is the increasingly important field of environmental protection (disposal of old electric appliances).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.004 | 0.010 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.048 | 0.057 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".