MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6922253158 · doi:10.1155/atr/8980195

Exploring the Causality of Accident Severity on Mountainous Freeways With a Two‐Stage Approach

2025· article· en· W6922253158 on OpenAlexvenueno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Advanced Transportation · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicEducational Robotics and Engineering
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersBasic and Applied Basic Research Foundation of Guangdong ProvinceNational Natural Science Foundation of ChinaU.S. Department of Transportation
KeywordsCluster analysisAccident (philosophy)Bayesian probabilityInferenceRobustness (evolution)Bayesian inferenceMixture modelCategorization

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Studies on accident severity on mountainous freeways have predominantly centered on the personal injury level, rather than the aggregation level. However, for quantifying the accident causality, clustering the accident severity from multidimensional perspectives based on data‐driven approach is seldom investigated in existing studies. To address this research gap, we propose a two‐stage methodology that integrates accident clustering with Bayesian inference. Initially, a Gaussian mixture clustering algorithm is developed to categorize accident severity. Subsequently, a Bayesian network is constructed to explore the risk factors associated with accident severity. The proposed model is calibrated and validated using accident data collected from mountainous freeways in Yunnan Province, China, spanning the period from 2016 to 2021. The findings suggest that our proposed accident clustering method exhibits superior robustness compared to alternative clustering techniques. Bayesian inference analysis further elucidates that accident severity is significantly influenced by factors such as driving behavior, weather conditions, and road surface conditions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.010
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.038
Threshold uncertainty score0.076

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.010
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.003
Bibliometrics0.0050.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.266
Teacher spread0.233 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Advanced TransportationSame topicEducational Robotics and EngineeringFrench-language works237,207