MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

A panel of diverse mitonucleogenotypes in <i>D</i>. <i>melanogaster</i>: Population setup and grouping according to mitochondrial and nuclear SNPs.

2023· other· en· W6922769934 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueFigshare · 2023
Typeother
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicPublic Administration and Political Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGenomePopulationNuclear geneMitochondrial DNASingle-nucleotide polymorphismAllele frequencyPopulation geneticsGenetic variationChromosome

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

<p>(<b>A</b>) Fly populations from Australia, Benin, and Canada were introgressed in all possible pairwise combinations, generating novel combinations of mitochondrial and nuclear genomes. Three biologically independent replicate populations were established per introgression. In every generation, 45 females and 45 males were crossed, allowing the potential for variation to segregate within each population. Map created in R with Natural Earth data. (<b>B</b>) PCA indicates purging of F<sub>0</sub> mothers’ nucleogenotypes, and homogeneous substitution with nuclear genomes from donor populations. PCA was performed on per-population allele frequencies, of all observed nuclear SNPs on the major chromosome arms (2L, 2R, 3L, 3R, and X). Each point represents a distinct population, color-coded as per panel (A). Points representing diverse nucleogenotypes sit on top of one another, suggesting homogenized nuclear genomes even in the presence of distinct mitochondria. (<b>C</b>) Proportional assignment of populations to clusters (“layers”) according to nuclear SNP frequency, by admixture analysis. Admixture proportions for each population were inferred by model-based clustering with ConStruct. Colors represent the proportion variants in each populations’ genome assigned to arbitrary clusters (“layers”). The analysis was instructed to assign populations to 3 layers (K = 3), because we expected 3 major groupings resulting from the 3 distinct geographic origins. Most variation in genomes originating from Australia, Benin, and Canada was assigned to clusters/layers 1, 2, and 3, respectively. To minimize effects of LD, only nuclear SNPs at least 1 kb apart and outside regions of no recombination were considered for PCA and admixture analyses. Population IDs are given below the barplot (mito. = mitogenotype, nuclear = nucleogenotype, rep = population replicate). Note that only 2 populations were sequenced per mito-nuclear combination, assuming that the anticipated nuclear homogenization would be equivalent in all 3 populations: The equivalent assignments of nucleogenotypes to layers suggest that this assumption was correct, and nuclear genotype is shaped by the nuclear intogression, independent of mitochondrial genotype, This recapitulates the PCA result (Panel B). (<b>D</b>) PCA shows 2 major groupings of mitogenotypes according to all observed mtDNA SNPs. Each point represents a distinct population, colour-coded as per panel (A). The intermediate population on PC1 represents population AA<sub>3</sub>, suggesting a mitogenotype in this population that is intermediate between the major clusters comprising mitogenotypes A (to the right) and mitogenotypes B and C (to the left). (<b>E</b>) Mitochondrial admixture proportions, showing assignment of populations to layers according to mtDNA SNP frequency. Admixture proportions for each population were inferred by model-based clustering with ConStruct (K = 3). Colors represent proportion assigned to each layer. Most variation in mtDNA originating from Australia, Benin, and Canada was assigned to clusters/layers 1, 2, and 3, respectively. The result suggests high levels of similarity among replicate mitogenotypes, largely independent of nucleogenotype, i.e., recapitulating the PCA result (Panel D). (<b>F</b>) Network analysis based on the major alleles in each population at the 27 differentiated sites. Populations are grouped according to allele frequency at indicated loci on mtDNA. SNPs distinguishing each cluster of populations are indicated in text, showing mtDNA position, gene, and whether for protein-coding genes whether the SNP was synonymous or not. (<b>G</b>) Segregation of major alleles for significantly differentiated mitochondrial SNPs. Heatmap shows nucleotide identity at positions in mitochondrial genome indicated at top. Gene for each position and SNP classification (synonymous/nonsynonymous) indicated by color bar at top, and geographic origin of mitochondrial and nuclear genomes indicated on right. Hierarchical clustering (dendrogram on left) shows separation of SNPs by geographic origin, with 5 constituent clusters. Concatenating SNP clusters with nucleogenotype reveals 8 mitonucleogenotypes, indicated to right. Data underlying the graphs shown in the figure can be found in <a href="http://www.plosbiology.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pbio.3002218#pbio.3002218.s020" target="_blank">S11</a>–<a href="http://www.plosbiology.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pbio.3002218#pbio.3002218.s023" target="_blank">S14</a> Tables. LD, linkage disequilibrium; PCA, principal components analysis; SNP, single nucleotide polymorphism.</p>

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.724
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0410.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.044
GPT teacher head0.292
Teacher spread0.248 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFigshareSame topicPublic Administration and Political AnalysisFrench-language works237,207