Research on coal gangue detection in coal preparation plant based on YOLOv5s-FSW model
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A coal gangue detection method in coal preparation plant based on YOLOv5s-FSW model is proposed to address the problems of insufficient feature extraction, large parameter quantity, low detection precision, and poor real-time performance in existing coal gangue detection models. This model is improved on the basis of YOLOv5s. Firstly, the C3 module in the Backbone section is replaced with a FasterNet Block structure, which improves detection speed by reducing the number of model parameters and computation. Secondly, in the Neck section, a parameter free SimAM attention mechanism is introduced to enhance the model's attention to important targets in complex environments, further improving the model's feature extraction capability. Finally, in the Prediction layer, the CIoU bounding box loss function is replaced with Wise-IoU, and the model focuses on ordinary quality anchor boxes to improve convergence speed and bounding box detection precision. The results of the ablation experiment indicate that compared with the YOLOv5s model, The mean average precision (mAP) of the YOLOv5s-FSW model has been improved by 1.9%, the model weight has been reduced by 0.6 MiB, the number of parameters has been reduced by 4.7%, and the detection speed has been improved by 19.3%. The comparative experimental results show that the YOLOv5s-FSW model has a mAP of 95.8%, which is 1.1%, 1.5%, and 1.2% higher compared to the YOLOv5s-CBC, YOLOv5s-ASA, and YOLOv5s-SDE models, respectively, and compared to YOLOv5m, YOLOv6s improved by 0.3%, 0.6% respectively. The detection speed of the YOLOv5s-FSW reaches 36.4 frames per second, which is 28.2% and 20.5% higher than the YOLOv5s-CBC and YOLOv5s-ASA models, respectively. Compared to YOLOv5m, YOLOv6s and YOLOv7, the detection speed of the YOLOv5s-FSW has increased by 16.3%, 15.2%, and 45.0%, respectively. The visualization experiment results of the thermal map show that the YOLOv5s-FSW model is more sensitive to the target feature areas of coal gangue and has higher attention. The detection experiment results show that in complex scenes with dim environments, blurred images, and mutual occlusion of targets, the YOLOv5s-FSW model has a higher confidence score for coal gangue target detection than the YOLOv5s model, and effectively avoids the occurrence of false positives and missed detection.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".