The contextual details of subgroup analysis included in this meta-analysis.
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
<p>HWE: Hardy-Weinberg Equilibrium; WBC: White blood cells; BALF: bronchoalveolar lavage fluid; NA: not available.</p><p>*: The HWE test results of <i>CYP1A1</i> Msp1 that could be calculated were shown in the table, and the items with * meant the result that had been reported in the articles.</p><p>: Due to different setting of smoking status in papers, people who had smoked were calculated as smokers.</p><p>OR<sup>a</sup>: Adjusted OR. ED: Epidemiological Design; NED: Non-epidemiology Design; WBC: blood, White blood cell lymphocytes, and serum. <sup>ζ</sup>: Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS).</p><p>: The OR 95% CI was captured from logistic analysis; I: Heavy-smoker; a: healthy control; b: hospital control.</p><p>: The <i>GSTM1</i> data of this study was omitted because of a bigger sample in the other study published in the same year.</p>
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.017 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.233 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it