MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Negative binomial generalized estimating equation models testing for the influence of the number of <i>I</i>. <i>scapularis</i> tick submissions on the occurrence of human Lyme disease cases; adult and nymphal <i>I</i>. <i>scapularis</i> submissions (Model 1) and nymphal <i>I</i>. <i>scapularis</i> submissions (Model 2) detected by the passive tick surveillance program in Ontario and Manitoba.

2019· dataset· en· W6923183060 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueFigshare · 2019
Typedataset
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEducation Methods and Technologies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLyme diseaseTickNegative binomial distributionBorrelia burgdorferiTick-borne diseaseGeneralized estimating equationBinomial distributionBinomial (polynomial)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

<p>Negative binomial generalized estimating equation models testing for the influence of the number of <i>I</i>. <i>scapularis</i> tick submissions on the occurrence of human Lyme disease cases; adult and nymphal <i>I</i>. <i>scapularis</i> submissions (Model 1) and nymphal <i>I</i>. <i>scapularis</i> submissions (Model 2) detected by the passive tick surveillance program in Ontario and Manitoba.</p>

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.007
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.042
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch, Meta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Open science, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.412
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0070.042
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0060.005
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0060.002
Bibliometrics0.0020.006
Science and technology studies0.0100.006
Scholarly communication0.0020.003
Open science0.0100.005
Research integrity0.0050.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.075
GPT teacher head0.330
Teacher spread0.256 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFigshareSame topicEducation Methods and TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207