MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6923316544 · doi:10.14288/1.0445568

Seasonal forecasting of streamflow in a mountainous catchment in British Columbia

2024· article· en· W6923316544 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenuecIRcle (University of British Columbia) · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicHydrological Forecasting Using AI
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsStreamflowFlood forecastingSnowpackDrainage basinForecast skillInflowHydropowerSeasonalityClimate change

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Forecasting of streamflow entering dam reservoirs is important for management of hydroelectricity operations, with economic and environmental impacts. On seasonal timescales, some prediction skill of variables that influence streamflow is derived from climate modes of variability, like the El Niño Southern Oscillation (ENSO) and Pacific Decadal Oscillation (PDO), among other factors. In this study, it is investigated how the phases of these climate modes affect inflow into the Kinbasket Lake Reservoir and Mica Dam in southeast British Columbia, a snowmelt-dominated catchment. El Niño and PDO positive phases produce greater streamflow than La Niña and PDO negative phases from April to June, with the opposite true from June to September, although the differences are small. It is investigated whether a forecast using meteorological conditions, affected by ENSO and PDO modes, to predict streamflow in this catchment achieves skill on seasonal timescales. The hybrid statistical-dynamical forecast of cumulative January to September seasonal streamflow at nine months lead time uses dynamical ECMWF SEAS5 seasonal meteorological hindcasts (retrospective "forecasts") as input into a Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) neural network. A monthly LSTM model using 12 months of meteorological forcings outperforms a daily LSTM model using 365 days of forcings at capturing the interannual variability in seasonal streamflow volumes when forced with reanalysis (ERA5) meteorological data. Skill in the meteorological inputs is required in at least the first three months of the forecast year, reflecting that the main source of streamflow prediction skill is derived from snowpack build up prior to and at the beginning of the forecast year, rather than ENSO and PDO indices. The hybrid streamflow forecast underestimates seasonal volumes in most years due to biases present in the SEAS5 hindcasts. Three bias correction methods are investigated, and linearly shifting the mean of the SEAS5 hindcasts to that of reanalysis gives the largest improvement in skill of the streamflow forecast. This study demonstrates that it is possible to use a hybrid statistical-dynamical forecast to predict seasonal volumes in a mountainous catchment, however the skill in predicting interannual variability is largely limited by the accuracy of prediction of meteorological forcings on seasonal timescales.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.486
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.181
Teacher spread0.170 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it