Selectivity comparison between the shaking and T90 codend.
Why is this work in the frame?
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame — the usual design — would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.
The three-model screen
all 1,000 screened works →All three models called this out of scope.
Figshare figure comparing size selectivity curves of two fishing codends; 'selectivity' here is fishing gear selectivity, a domain quantity, not a research-practice object.
This research data object presents fishery codend selectivity results, not a study of research practice.
Fisheries gear selectivity figure for redfish codends; domain applied science.
Abstract
<p>The left plot compares the size selectivity curves of the shaking codend versus the T90 codend: black and grey lines are the selection curves for the shaking codend and T90 codend, respectively; black and grey dashed lines are the 95% Efron percentile confidence intervals for the shaking and T90 codend, respectively. The right plot illustrates the delta curve: black line is the delta curve; grey dashed lines are the 95% Efron percentile confidence intervals. The vertical grey dashed lines in both plots represent the minimum landing size (MLS) for Canadian redfish fishery.</p>
Stored with the screening record, where it is evidence for the labels above.
The record
- Venue
- Figshare
- Topic
- Field
- Canadian institutions
- —
- Funders
- —
- Keywords
- PercentilePlot (graphics)Line (geometry)Confidence intervalDistribution (mathematics)
- Has abstract in OpenAlex
- yes