MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Review and reflection on shale gas development in China: From Silurian to Cambrian

2025· article· en· W6923600655 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueDOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicHydrocarbon exploration and reservoir analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsShale gasOil shaleReflection (computer programming)ChinaPermianFossil fuel

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

After 20 years of shale gas exploration and development, China has become the third country that achieves commercial shale gas production, following the United States and Canada. However, earlier exploration and development of the layer were limited to the Silurian Longmaxi Formation. With improved theoretical understanding of shale gas exploration, China has made exploration breakthroughs in Permian and Cambrian shales in recent years, demonstrating the great potential of shale gas in Sichuan Basin. Based on a review of the exploration history of shale gas in the two major marine phases—Silurian Longmaxi Formation and Cambrian Qiongzhusi Formation, this study summarizes the three phases of shale gas exploration: research and exploration (2000-2011), discovery and production (2011-2022), and multi-layer breakthroughs (2022-present). This study thoroughly analyzes the process of two theoretical innovations and paradigm shifts in the exploration and research of marine shale gas in Sichuan Basin. (1) After comparing the formation conditions and exploration and development characteristics of shale gas between China and the United States, Chinese researchers abandoned the simple replication of North American experience, and highlighted the critical role of preservation conditions based on the evolution characteristics of China’s multi-phase tectonics. This completed the first paradigm shift and achieved major exploration breakthroughs in the Silurian Longmaxi Formation. (2) Research on the characteristics of low-organic matter and inorganic pores was enhanced. Traditional theories of enrichment and reservoir formation were developed and improved, and a “migration+in situ” reservoir formation mode was established. This completed the second paradigm shift and led to exploration breakthroughs in Cambrian Qiongzhusi Formation. Recent research breakthroughs in low-organic shale, inorganic pores, and other aspects have expanded both the scope and depth of shale gas exploration, leading to a multi-layer exploration pattern of marine shale gas. It demonstrates broad exploration prospects and strategic value for national energy security. Based on a review of the exploration history and paradigm shifts from the Silurian to the Cambrian periods, as well as an analysis of the implications from major breakthroughs, this study reveals an exploration path of shale gas with Chinese characteristics, providing important references for future exploration and development of multi-layer and multi-field shale gas.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.016

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0050.009
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.129
GPT teacher head0.489
Teacher spread0.360 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)→Same topicHydrocarbon exploration and reservoir analysis→French-language works237,207→