A CNN-Based Framework for Automatic Extraction of High-Resolution River Bankfull Width
Bibliographic record
Abstract
River width is a crucial parameter that correlates and reflects the hydrological, geomorphological, and ecological characteristics of the channel. However, the width data with high spatial resolution is limited owing to the difficulties in extracting channel width under complex and variable riverine surroundings. To address this issue, we aimed to develop an automatic framework specifically for delineating river channels and measuring the bankfull widths at small spatial intervals along the channel. The DeepLabV3+ Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) model was employed to accurately delineate channel boundaries and a Voronoi Diagram approach was complemented as the river width algorithm (RWA) to calculate river bankfull widths. The CNN model was trained by images across four river types and performed well with all the evaluating metrics (mIoU, Accuracy, F1-score, and Recall) higher than 0.97, referring to the accuracy over 97% in prediction. The RWA outperformed other existing river width calculation methods by showing lower errors. The application of the framework in the Lillooet River, Canada, presented the capacity of this methodology to obtain detailed distributions of hydraulic and hydrological parameters, including flow resistance, flow energy, and sediment transport capacity, based on high-resolution channel widths. Our work highlights the significant potential of the newly developed framework in acquiring high-resolution channel width information and characterizing fluvial dynamics based on these widths along river channels, which contributes to facilitating cost-effective integrated river management.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".