MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W6923648417 · doi:10.14288/1.0438571

Microscopic agent-based modeling and simulation of cyclists on off-street paths

2024· article· en· W6923648417 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenuecIRcle (University of British Columbia) · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicUrban Transport and Accessibility
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOvertakingMicrosimulationRepresentation (politics)Autoregressive modelTrajectoryImitationSimulation modelingPosition (finance)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Inclusion of bicycle traffic in microsimulation tools is essential for evaluating bicycle-accessible infrastructure projects. However, the representation of bicycles in microsimulation models is still at an early stage of development. A better understanding of cyclist behaviour during various interactions is needed to enhance bicycle microsimulation models, which is a pre-requisite for accurate microscopic modeling of bicycle traffic operations. Due to the limited availability of detailed data, the inherent complexity of cyclist decision-making, and the substantial heterogeneity in cycling behaviour, modeling cyclist operation behaviour requires novel methods and techniques. This thesis aims first to characterize cyclist maneuvers in following and overtaking interactions using multivariate finite mixture model-based clustering. Second, an agent-based bicycle simulation method is proposed to model cyclists as intelligent agents making operational and tactical decisions based on their observations of the operating environment. Cyclist position data associated with time stamps are used to infer state and future decisions. The data are extracted from videos collected in Vancouver, BC, Canada using computer vision techniques. For segmenting behavioural states, observations of cyclists in following interactions are clustered into constrained and unconstrained states. Observations of overtaking cyclists are clustered into initiation, merging and post-overtaking states. Generative adversarial imitation learning (GAIL) is used to infer the uncertain intentions and preferences of cyclists from observational data. The model is validated by comparing multivariate distributions of variables such as speed, direction, and spacing of observed and simulated cyclist trajectories. The model performs well in comparison to two other cyclist simulation models from the literature. The proposed approach to miscrosimulation is a significant advancement in agent-based modeling methods, with continuous, non-linear, and stochastic representation of states, decisions, and actions. By modeling cyclist heterogeneity, the proposed approach can enhance applications in bicycle facility planning and design, safety modeling, and energy modeling with consideration of the full diversity of cyclists. Such an advancement is necessary for developing bicycle networks for all ages and abilities of riders.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.035
Threshold uncertainty score0.069

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.238
Teacher spread0.222 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuecIRcle (University of British Columbia)→Same topicUrban Transport and Accessibility→French-language works237,207→