MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6923731305 · doi:10.15026/89882

Skills and training required for museum professionals in the changing environment surrounding museums : cases in the United Kingdom

2017· other· en· W6923731305 on OpenAlexfundno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueInstitutional Repositories DataBase (IRDB) · 2017
Typeother
Languageen
FieldChemical Engineering
TopicOdor and Emission Control Technologies
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersDivision of Human Resource DevelopmentUlster UniversityDurham UniversityUniversity of GlasgowUniversity of LeedsUniversity of WarwickUniversity of OxfordUniversity of EssexUniversity College LondonUniversity of St AndrewsUniversity of LeicesterTrent UniversityUniversity of East AngliaAberystwyth UniversityUniversity of AberdeenNewcastle UniversityQueen Margaret UniversityUniversity for the Creative ArtsUniversity of Central LancashireNorthumbria UniversityNottingham Trent UniversityBournemouth UniversityBath Spa UniversityKingston UniversityLiverpool Hope UniversityUniversity of East London
KeywordsTraining (meteorology)KingdomGovernment (linguistics)Curriculum

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Time to Think How to Create a Happy Workplace, Out of Our Minds, Business Poetry, Story Telling, Resilience and Work Life Balance Front of House Training Visitor Care and Diversity, Branding and Signage, Intro to Tech Services and Conservation, Intro to Learning Dept Intro to WID, Access & Disability, Security & Risk Assessment, Culture plan & Positive Working Cultures Intro to Asia Collection, Dealing with Violence & Aggression, Intro to Blythe House, Presentation Skills Future plan & Exhibitions, Deaf Awareness, Intro to Med Ren, Anti-Terrorism & ERP, Working with Respect Source: V&A reply to Authors' inquiry

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.008
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.224
Threshold uncertainty score0.446

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.008
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0110.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.062
GPT teacher head0.315
Teacher spread0.252 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueInstitutional Repositories DataBase (IRDB)Same topicOdor and Emission Control TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207