MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6923733417 · doi:10.15027/33978

科学に対する態度と科学的リテラシーに関する構造的分析

2012· article· en· W6923733417 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueInstitutional Repositories DataBase (IRDB) · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEducation, Safety, and Science Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNucleofectionGestational periodTSG101LiquationHyporeflexiaDiafiltrationDysgeusiaDemotion

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

As the results of PISA2006 (OECD, 2007) and other international assessments have been realized, there are concerns in Japan that although students show the high score of scientific literacy their interests in science were low. In this study, we explore the structure of attitudes towards science and scientific literacy based on the comparison of following five countries: Australia, Canada, Finland, Japan and New Zealand. The model of this analysis includes the six constructs (f 1:ENJ, f 2:GEV, f 3:PEV, f 4:FUM, f 5:GEI, f 6:INM) of attitudes towards science and scientific literacy score (f 7:SCL) with multiple group method. As the results of this analysis, the direct effects of each construct and total effects on f 7:SCL show the similarity between Australia, Canada and New Zealand. On the other hand, the total effect of f 5:GEI on f 7:SCL in Japan is bigger than other countries' one.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.927
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0040.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.002
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.053
GPT teacher head0.369
Teacher spread0.316 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it