MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6923765533 · doi:10.14288/1.0178011

Daily Building Record

2016· article· en· W6923765533 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueOpen Collections · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicDigital Innovation in Industries
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPublishingHistorical recordProject commissioningArchitectureRecord keeping

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Daily Building Record was published in Vancouver, and ran from January 1912 to October 1914. As the official publication for the Architectural Institute of B.C., the B.C. Builders Exchange, and the Building and Construction Industries Exchange of B.C., the Record primarily covered news related to building, contracting, engineering, real estate, and industrial finance. The Record was published by the Record Publishing Company, which subsequently published the paper under different titles, including the British Columbia Building Record and the British Columbia Record. The Record continues as the Journal of Commerce. ; Building, Contracting, Engineering, Irrigation and General Improvement News. Devoted to the interests of Architects, Contractors, Engineers, Material Dealers and others interested in the building trade of the N.W.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScholarly communication, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.113
Threshold uncertainty score0.997

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0040.003
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.047
GPT teacher head0.265
Teacher spread0.218 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOpen CollectionsSame topicDigital Innovation in IndustriesFrench-language works237,207