MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W6924639062 · doi:10.15468/dl.ty96uk

Occurrence Download

2025· dataset· en· W6924639062 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueGlobal Biodiversity Information Facility · 2025
Typedataset
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicPhonetics and Phonology Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHerbariumDownloadSpecies nameVascular plantMatching (statistics)Natural history

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A dataset containing 140 species occurrences available in GBIF matching the query: { "and" : [ "Country is United States of America", "DatasetKey is one of (University of Michigan Herbarium, A global database for the distributions of crop wild relatives, Royal Ontario Museum Green Plant Herbarium (TRT), Central Michigan University Herbarium, G. S. Torrey Herbarium at the University of Connecticut (CONN), Morton Arboretum - Vascular Plants, Field Museum of Natural History (Botany) Seed Plant Collection, CHAS Botany Collection (Arctos), Michigan State University Herbarium Vascular Plants)", "Geometry POLYGON((-87.31435 46.51278,-87.46441 41.49606,-81.94034 41.45555,-81.91055 43.48909,-83.58995 46.23723,-84.94429 46.87913,-87.31435 46.51278))", "HasGeospatialIssue is false", "TaxonKey is Malus coronaria (L.) Mill." ] } The dataset includes 140 records from 9 constituent datasets; see https://api.gbif.org/v1/occurrence/download/0071489-241126133413365/datasets/export for details. Data from some individual datasets included in this download may be licensed under less restrictive terms.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Dataset · Consensus signal: Dataset
Teacher disagreement score0.860
Threshold uncertainty score0.467

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.002
Bibliometrics0.0060.011
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0030.003
Open science0.0030.003
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1400.209

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.297
Teacher spread0.273 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreDataset

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGlobal Biodiversity Information Facility→Same topicPhonetics and Phonology Research→French-language works237,207→