Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
DESY-HERA. Measurement of diffractive production cross sections and structure functions in DIS scattering of 27.5 GeV electrons with 920 GeV protons. The data come from the 1998-1999 running period and have an integrated luminosity of 4.2 pb-1. The data cover the GAMMA*P centre of mass energy W from 37 to 245 GeV and Q**2 from 2.2 to 8.0 GeV. Data are presented as cross sections and also in terms of the diffractive structure function F2(NAME=D3) as a function of X(NAME=POMERON), BETA and Q**2. X(NAME=POMERON) is the fraction of the protons momentum carried by the Pomeron and BETA is the fraction of the Pomeron momentum carried by the struck quark. DESY-HERA. Measurement of diffractive production cross sections and structure functions in DIS scattering of 27.5 GeV electrons with 920 GeV protons. The data come from the 1998-1999 running period and have an integrated luminosity of 4.2 pb-1. The data cover the GAMMA*P centre of mass energy W from 37 to 245 GeV and Q**2 from 2.2 to 8.0 GeV. Data are presented as cross sections and also in terms of the diffractive structure function F2(NAME=D3) as a function of X(NAME=POMERON), BETA and Q**2. X(NAME=POMERON) is the fraction of the protons momentum carried by the Pomeron and BETA is the fraction of the Pomeron momentum carried by the struck quark.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.021 | 0.430 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it