Snow on Antarctic Sea Ice - McMurdo Sound 2022
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Data of snow and sea ice in the McMurdo Sound, October-December 2022. The data was collected as part of the New Zealand Marsden Fund Research Grant 21-VUW-103 "Can Snow Change the Fate of Antarctic Sea Ice?" The dataset includes raw data of the manual snow and sea ice measurements from snow pits and ice cores (temperature, density, salinity, dO18), measurements of snow water equivalent (SWE), spatial information of snow height (MagnaProbe) and sea ice thickness (EM-31), AWS (air temperature, wind speed, wind direction, relative humidity, pressure), radiations stations (shortwave, longwave, thermal IR, spectral shortwave), differential GPS data (3 fixed stations on different sea ice thicknesses, + 1 rover station for georeferencing UAV measurements), SIMBA buoy temperature (+heated temperature) data (3 buoys during November, 1 buoy for 15 months), UAV data: RGB, thermal IR, broadband albedo, spectral albedo, Chlorophyll-a from ice cores (bottom 10 cm), NIR reflectivity data of snow at 850 nm, and 940 nm (snow surface, profile, ice surface), photographs (1. overview of field sites, 2. for Structure from Motion for surface roughness, 3. macrophotos of snow) surface impurity concentrations, microCT data of snow microstructure, Denoth probe (density) and InfraSnow (specific surface area - SSA). See the README file in each dataset for detailed information.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.011 | 0.005 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".