GENDER AND CANNABIS USE IN CANADA AND THE UNITED STATES: FINDINGS FROM THE INTERNATIONAL CANNABIS POLICY STUDY
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Gender differences in cannabis use are well-established. In addition to higher prevalence of use, men who use cannabis are more likely to report daily use and consume greater quantities. However, much of the literature examining gender and cannabis use fails to reflect important distinctions between sex and gender identity. The limited research that exists indicates notable differences in cannabis use among individuals who identify as transgender, non-binary, or broadly gender-diverse. Most population-level cannabis studies lack the necessary questions to examine gender identity, while studies that do adequately distinguish between sex and gender typically lack sufficient gender-diverse sample sizes to support quantitative analyses. The current study aims to examine the relationship between gender identity and patterns of cannabis use in Canada and the United States (US).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.005 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it