MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6925226522 · doi:10.17613/hq55g-89r58

Rivalry and Enmity in Q

2024· article· en· W6925226522 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueKnowledge Commons (Lakehead University) · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicUrban Development and Societal Issues
Canadian institutionsSt. Francis Xavier University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRivalryMartyrConstruct (python library)Criticism

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Q is a site of tension, some of which is preserved from the time of Q's composition and redaction, and some of which goes back to the historical Jesus. "This generation," which mistreats prophets, is one of the most interesting points of tension in Q. Q's Jesus draws on martyr discourse to situate John the Baptist's apocalyptic message within the noble lineage of past ill-treated prophets vindicated only in hindsight. Q repurposes this discourse to lend gravitas to Jesus' own death, as well as to actively construct what makes "a good Jew."

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.012
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.020
Threshold uncertainty score0.047

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.012
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0200.050
Scholarly communication0.0110.009
Open science0.0010.012
Research integrity0.0030.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0100.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.038
GPT teacher head0.280
Teacher spread0.242 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueKnowledge Commons (Lakehead University)Same topicUrban Development and Societal IssuesFrench-language works237,207