MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6925237346 · doi:10.17605/osf.io/s69fe

Selection criteria

2023· article· en· W6925237346 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueOpen Science Framework · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicAmino Acid Enzymes and Metabolism
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSelection (genetic algorithm)PopulationInclusion and exclusion criteriaIntervention (counseling)Inclusion (mineral)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Literature that meets the criteria listed in the attached file will be included in our scoping review. Inclusion and exclusion criteria are classified according to the following categories, based on the PICOS structured approach: 1) population and setting, 2) intervention and outcome, 3) study design, 4) source, and 5) language. No restriction will be applied regarding year of publication.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.032
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.121
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.861
Threshold uncertainty score0.463

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0320.121
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0030.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0120.004
Bibliometrics0.0250.016
Science and technology studies0.0030.002
Scholarly communication0.0050.005
Open science0.0040.004
Research integrity0.0080.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1390.023

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.364
Teacher spread0.341 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOpen Science FrameworkSame topicAmino Acid Enzymes and MetabolismFrench-language works237,207