MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6925241280 · doi:10.17895/ices.pub.24753882

Detection Efficiency of Vemco Mobile Transceivers Deployed on Grey Seals (Halichoerus grypus) on the Scotian Shelf

2013· other· en· W6925241280 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueOpen MIND · 2013
Typeother
Languageen
FieldDecision Sciences
TopicScientific Computing and Data Management
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGlobal Positioning SystemTransceiverRaw dataSeal (emblem)Mobile phone

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

No abstracts are to be cited without prior reference to the author. Understanding the nature of inter-specific and conspecific interactions in the ocean is challenging because direct observation is usually impossible. The development of two-way coded Vemco Mobile Transceivers (VMT) and satellite-linked GPS tags provides a unique opportunity to elucidate between and within species interactions in space and time. In order to interpret interactions we must accurately define their locations, duration, and frequency, which requires accurate knowledge of tag performance. We evaluated VMT detection efficiency deployed on grey seals (Sable Island, NS, Canada) in response to environmental characteristics and seal behaviour. We used generalized additive modelling techniques (GAM) to compare expected detections calculated from the GPS data to those observed, and corroborated these findings using the raw ping data. Distance between seals, wind stress, and minimum depth were the most important predictors of detection success. However, other environmental characteristics postulated to affect sound propagation, including temperature and depth properties, were not important in the model.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.463
Threshold uncertainty score0.992

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0040.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0210.009

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.108
GPT teacher head0.367
Teacher spread0.259 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOpen MINDSame topicScientific Computing and Data ManagementFrench-language works237,207