MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6925254269 · doi:10.17632/4dppbnz6dx

Supplementary data for Protocol to calculate aircraft emissions for international air routes in South America

2022· dataset· en· W6925254269 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueMendeley Data · 2022
Typedataset
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMicrobial Natural Products and Biosynthesis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTable (database)Air pollutantsAir pollutionMontreal ProtocolGreenhouse gasPollutant

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The CCD and LTO emissions of each route and airline for the six pollutions are shown in Supplementary Tables S1- S3. For example, the first data in Supplementary Table S1 represents the LTO emissions and CCD emissions of six pollutants on the Cali-Caracas route of Avior Airlines. The overall emissions of the airline on the route are the sum of the LTO emissions and CCD emissions. The emission intensities of the six pollutions of each aircraft type can be found in Supplementary Tables S4-S6. For example, the first data in Supplementary Table S4 shows the CO2 emission intensity of each aircraft type in the 0-500 segment.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Dataset · Consensus signal: Dataset
Teacher disagreement score0.061
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0030.005
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0200.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.070
GPT teacher head0.375
Teacher spread0.305 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreDataset

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMendeley DataSame topicMicrobial Natural Products and BiosynthesisFrench-language works237,207