MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6925318726 · doi:10.18130/ratx-m959

LLM Threat Query - Improving LLM KQL Generation; Bridging Actors And Accountability In AI Driven Misinformation Using Actor Network Theory; Earthquake Analysis And Prediction: Comparing ETAS And USGS Earthquake Data

2025· article· en· W6925318726 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueLibra · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological formations and processes
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsProspectusMisinformationAccountabilityStakeholderWorkflowBridging (networking)NIST

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Technical Report Earthquakes pose a significant threat to human lives and infrastructure, providing a need for accurate earthquake forecasting models to help mitigate risk. My capstone research project presents a comprehensive analysis comparing synthetic earthquake simulations generated by the Epidemic-Type Aftershock Sequence (ETAS) model with historical earthquake records from the United States Geological Survey (USGS) spanning 1960 to 2023. I found discrepancies between modeled and observed data by analyzing patterns and energy related to significant earthquakes (magnitude ≥ 6.5). Notably, ETAS simulated data shows higher average energy levels before and after major earthquakes, while USGS data indicates a considerable energy spike just before the main event, which is not observed in ETAS data. STS Prospectus & Research Paper My STS research paper examines Air Canada’s 2024 chatbot failure through ANT and argues that the chatbot’s failure was a result of its actor-network rather than an isolated technical error. It examined several factors within Air Canada’s network that contributed to this failure including corporate strategy, industry trends, cheaper GPU access, and legal ambiguities and accountability. The technical project presented in the Prospectus develops a framework to improve the accuracy of Large Language Model (LLM) queries in generating Kusto Query Language (KQL) queries. Working on both projects simultaneously enhanced my understanding of AI products and failures in their implementation. The technical project allowed me to focus on combating AI hallucinations from a technical perspective, enriched by insights from STS research, which shows how socio-technical dynamics shape technical design. Note: technical project referenced is LLM Threat Query that I have been working on during fall 2024 - spr 2025 which is unrelated to my capstone research - Earthquake Analysis And Prediction, that I completed during spr 2024.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.418
Threshold uncertainty score0.500

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.003
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.035
GPT teacher head0.253
Teacher spread0.218 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it