MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W6925329185 · doi:10.17895/ices.pub.24753180

Zooplankton community variability on the Scotian Shelf, northwest Atlantic

2013· other· en· W6925329185 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueOpen MIND · 2013
Typeother
Languageen
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsZooplanktonCalanusOcean gyreArcticPelagic zoneTemperature salinity diagramsStratification (seeds)Subtropics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

No abstracts are to be cited without prior reference to the author. Marine zooplankton populations and communities are influenced by changes in local environmental conditions and ocean circulation. To provide information on how interannual changes in the pelagic environment and larger scale changes in circulation influence zooplankton communities of the Scotian Shelf, in the Canadian northwest Atlantic, multivariate analyses were used to evaluate mesozooplankton species associations and large‐scale spatial patterns in zooplankton communities at both the Scotian Shelf scale and the larger Atlantic Canadian shelf scale. Depth and temperature associations were dominant factors structuring Atlantic Canadian shelf communities. Scotian Shelf species groups could be categorized as dominant shelf species, warm shelf species, Arctic Calanus species, and warm and cold offshore species. The abundance of immigrant groups, Arctic Calanus and warm offshore species, were strongly correlated with variability in temperature, while dynamics of the dominant species were more complex. While there is substantial uncertainty about how conditions on the Scotian Shelf will change in the future, the influence of the subtropical gyre may become greater, and it is likely that temperature will increase, salinity will decrease, and stratification will increase. Information on large‐scale zooplankton community patterns can provide insight into how species ranges and communities may change in the future.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.211
Threshold uncertainty score0.424

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.045
GPT teacher head0.291
Teacher spread0.246 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOpen MIND→French-language works237,207→