MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6925354247 · doi:10.17026/ar/qsq83t

‘Felix heeft het gemaakt’

2024· dataset· nl· W6925354247 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueData Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) · 2024
Typedataset
Languagenl
FieldPsychology
TopicPsychology Research and Bibliometrics
Canadian institutionsKelowna General Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsContext (archaeology)PraiseRidiculous

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In 1977 vond Ad Muyris bij Vechten een Romeinse glazen kanbodem met de zeldzame inscriptie “FELIX FECIT,” wat “Felix heeft het gemaakt” betekent. Dit unieke stuk, afkomstig van een Romeinse tonkan uit de tweede eeuw, werd in een driedelige mal geblazen. De tonkan, waarschijnlijk voor wijn, toont de naam Felix, mogelijk de maker, een zeldzaam kenmerk. De Felix-stempel komt op slechts vijf andere Romeinse glazen in Europa voor, en dit exemplaar uit Houten onderscheidt zich door een afwijkende plaatsing en stijl van de letters. Het stuk is een belangrijk, uniek overblijfsel van Romeins glaswerk.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Scholarly communication, Open science, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Open science, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Dataset · Consensus signal: Dataset
Teacher disagreement score0.031
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.000
Bibliometrics0.0060.009
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0100.010
Research integrity0.0010.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.034

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.055
GPT teacher head0.380
Teacher spread0.325 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it