MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6925369711 · doi:10.17632/3h8347w6d9

SDesti: An R package for the analysis of aquatic benthos environmental studies’ data

2023· dataset· en· W6925369711 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueMendeley Data · 2023
Typedataset
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicDevelopmental Biology and Gene Regulation
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBenthosEnvironmental dataRegression analysisSampling (signal processing)Variable (mathematics)Representativeness heuristicCovariateVariablesMultivariate statisticsLinear regression

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Data analysis is one of the most relevant steps of aquatic benthic environmental monitoring and research studies, and should be a fundamental consideration in both the planning (i.e., defining appropriate sampling design strategies) and implementation phases (application of appropriate standardized sampling procedures). A common objective of these studies is to identify relationships between environmental stressors and benthic bioindicator metrics. However, assessing these relationships is a complex process. Multivariate regression model adjustment coupled with forward and backward model selection routines is an appropriate complementary statistical analysis tool to test for the existence of statistically significant associations between a non-autocorrelated biological response and each variable within a group of environmental covariates included in a model. With this in mind, we developed SDesti, a user-friendly R package to analyze benthos data (number of individuals, biomass, chlorophyll concentration, or biological indices, excluding beta diversity metrics). SDesti contains four user accessible functions. AnalysisDescriptives() and Estimation() give information on the quality, homogeneity and representativeness of the data for one sampling campaign for one site. TimeLineAnalysisDescriptives() performs the descriptive analysis that usually precedes the adjustment of a regression model. TimeLineAnalysis() automatically adjusts an adequate regression model (linear, Poisson, quasipoisson, or negative binomial) and also returns the necessary measures and graphics to evaluate the quality of the adjustment and verify the model assumptions. SDesti greatly simplifies the process of data analysis and can be easily used by non-statisticians. The analytical package includes a complete manual that provides detailed information: on the data structure requirements, on the variable nomenclature rules and program operating procedures, on the data analysis (complemented with examples) and on the interpretation of the results (type ??SDesti on R console). SDesti eliminates redundancy, reduces human error and, coupled with a suitable sampling design, standard sampling and sample treatment procedures, it contributes to improve the consistency of the results in environmental studies. SDesti binary for windows users and installation instructions can be found below. Compiled for R 4.3.2 version. Refer to the program PDF manual for a detailed description of the data structures, functions, data analyses and interpretation of results. Type ??SDesti on R, or RStudio consoles and select the PDF file. Note: RStudio 2023.09.1 has a bug that delivers an error message when trying to open PDF vignettes (program manuals). Use R 4.3.2 console to open SDesti's PDF manual.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Dataset · Consensus signal: Dataset
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.761

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0030.003
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.130
GPT teacher head0.385
Teacher spread0.255 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreDataset

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMendeley DataSame topicDevelopmental Biology and Gene RegulationFrench-language works237,207