MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6925383475 · doi:10.17632/2tvjhzrksp

Data for a REGULAMENTAÇÃO DA NOVA LEI DE LICITAÇÕES: DEFINIÇÃO DA LÓGICA INSTITUCIONAL PREVALENTE EM UM CAMPO published by RAC-Revista de Administração Contemporânea

2022· dataset· pt· W6925383475 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueMendeley Data · 2022
Typedataset
Languagept
FieldHealth Professions
TopicElectronic Health Records Systems
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNova (rocket)Field (mathematics)Nova scotiaContext (archaeology)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

10 (dez) atas de reuniões da Comissão Especial na Câmara dos Deputados, ocorridas entre 20/03/2018 a 05/12/2018, contendo discursos de atores-chave (conforme Tabela 1). Transcrições de 16 (dezesseis) entrevistas realizadas com atores selecionados (conforme Tabela 2).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.031
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.011
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch, Meta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Open science, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMetaresearch, Meta-epidemiology (narrow), Open science, Research integrity
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Dataset · Consensus signal: Dataset
Teacher disagreement score0.041
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0310.011
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0030.003
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0040.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0040.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.003
Open science0.0260.018
Research integrity0.0030.010
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0410.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.270
GPT teacher head0.468
Teacher spread0.198 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreDataset

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMendeley DataSame topicElectronic Health Records SystemsFrench-language works237,207