A new version of AAKL (the matrix elements of spin-orbit interaction) adapted to spectroscopic notation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Title of the program: SPINORBIT WEIGHTS 2 Catalogue number: ACXL Program obtainable from: CPC Program Library, Queen's University of Belfast, N. Ireland (see application form in this issue) Computer: Amdahl 470 V/6; Installation: University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada Operating system: MTS Programming language used: FORTRAN IV High speed core required: 25590 bytes No. of bits per byte: 8 Overlay structure: none Other peripherals used: card reader, line printer, card punch No. of mag... Title of program: SPINORBIT WEIGHTS 2 Catalogue Id: AAKL_v2_0 [ACXL] Nature of problem This program is a revision of Klotz's program for calculation of the matrix elements of the one-body spin-orbit interaction using multiconfigurational wave-functions. A recent correction has been included in the present version. Versions of this program held in the CPC repository in Mendeley Data AAKL_v1_0; SPINORBITWEIGHTS; 10.1016/0010-4655(75)90027-2 AAKL_v2_0; SPINORBIT WEIGHTS 2; 10.1016/0010-4655(77)90013-3 This program has been imported from the CPC Program Library held at Queen's University Belfast (1969-2018)
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.007 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.409 | 0.253 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".