MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6925437772 · doi:10.17605/osf.io/wbg7s

Peran Psychological Well-Being terhadap Quarter Life Crisis pada Emerging Adulthood

2024· other· id· W6925437772 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueOpen Science Framework · 2024
Typeother
Languageid
FieldDecision Sciences
TopicScientific Computing and Data Management
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsQuarter (Canadian coin)Sample (material)Population

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mencari tahu peran psychological well-being terhadap quarter life crisis pada emerging adulthood. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah penelitian kuantitatif dengan teknik pengambilan sampel convenience sampling pada populasi emerging adulthood dengan rentang usia 18-25 tahun di Daerah Khusus Jakarta. Dengan hipotesis adanya peran yang signifikan pada PWB dalam mempengaruhi QLC di fase emerging adulthood. Berdasarkan hasil pada penelitian ditemukan bahwa PWB memiliki peran yang signifikan pada QLC dengan nilai sebesar 82.8%.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.025
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.011
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch, Meta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Open science, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesOpen science, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.433
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0250.011
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.012
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0330.002
Open science0.0270.013
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1250.056

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.063
GPT teacher head0.417
Teacher spread0.354 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it