Labour Force Survey 3. quarter 1984 - 4. quarter 1985, panel
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Labour Force Survey, 3. quarter 1984 - 4. quarter 1985, panel (6 quarters). As of the 1st quarter of 1972, SSB has conducted official quarterly labour force surveys (LFS). These surveys aim to give the labour force authorities (and other people interested) knowledge of the occupational structure of the population and how it develops over time. The surveys are meant to give a foundation and statistical material for occupational prognoses and labour research. In the Labour Force Surveys each respondent is interviewed for two subsequent quarters, followed up by a two quarter break. Then they are again followed up with two subsequent quarters. The first complete edition of LFS is the Labour Force Survey of 1972. Such statistics was originally intended to be a more analytical supplement to the monthly employment statistics which were based on the National Insurance membership index. The statistics was based on the national insuranse index until the sickness benefit was included in the national insuranse system januar 1st 1971. Gradually LFS has evolved to become the main source of knowledge about the condition and trends in the labor market. General information on the Labour Force Surveys: http://www.nsd.uib.no/data/ny_individ/norStudy/aku.html Summary of AKU panels with detailed explanations for panel files: Data collection for the LFS was started somewhat experimental in 1971, but the data are first published in 1972. It may be helpful to look at the following section of the detailed view: Pool 1977|1978|1979|1980|1981|1982 |1983|1984|1985|1986|1987 | Quarter 1234 |1234|1234|1234 |1234|1234 |1234|1234|1234|1234|1234 --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 44 |____|____|____|____|___X|X__X|X___|____|____|____|____|____| 597_1 = 1983,1 45 |____|____|____|____|____|XX__|XX__|____|____|____|____|____| 597_2 = 1983,2 46 |____|____|____|____|____|_XX_|_XX_|____|____|____|____|____| 597_3 = 1983,3 47 |____|____|____|____|____|__XX|__XX|____|____|____|____|____| 597_4 = 1983,4 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 48 |____|____|____|____|____|___X|X__X|X___|____|____|____|____| 598_1 = 1984,1 49 |____|____|____|____|____|____|XX__|XX__|____|____|____|____| 598_2 = 1984,2 50 |____|____|____|____|____|____|_XX_|_XX_|____|____|____|____| 598_3 = 1984,3 51 |____|____|____|____|____|____|__XX|__XX|____|____|____|____| 598_4 = 1984,4 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 52 |____|____|____|____|____|____|___X|X__X|X___|____|____|____| 599_1 = 1985,1 53 |____|____|____|____|____|____|____|XX__|XX__|____|____|____| 599_2 = 1985,2 54 |____|____|____|____|____|____|____|_XX_|_XX_|____|____|____| 599_3 = 1985,3 55 |____|____|____|____|____|____|____|__XX|__XX|____|____|____| 599_4 = 1985,4 Panel files are created by linking four interviews from an ordinary interview round of the LFS. In the table above this means one could connect all the pools (lines) labeled X. Participation 4th time is used as the criterion for the selection process. In 1975 there was a break in the panel systematics, see 1975. The Labour Force Survey of 1976, adopted a slightly modified questionnaire and you came back to the original 6-quarterly rotation schedule which have been stable since. If one looks at a particular column, for example 1st quarter of 1984, we will see that 1/4 of the respondents are included for the fourth time, for the third time, etc. The total sums the the material for one block. Quarterly weighting allows one such block (column) to be balanced with national figures. To give proper weighted figures for a annual volume consisting of four quarters, the quarterly weights has to be divides by 4. The panels goes horizontally and each panel will have 4 weights, one for each quarter. Although they do not differ much, the weights will be prepared independently and each of them should be used for the data which the quarterly weight is made. Weighted figures apply to a pool, which means approx. 25% of the total quarterly sample, and one has to multiply by 4 to get the approximate national quarterly figures. By "Approximate national quarterly figures" it means that differences from the quarterly national weighted figures can appear, because of the selections and whitdrawal in the connection of the panels. Because of the whitdrawal inflated numbers will be lower than the national total figures. The main point of the weights is not to give national totals, but rather to ensure the best possible representation. This panel consider pool 55 in the table above.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.008 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.068 | 0.066 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".