MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6925571463 · doi:10.17632/gf2s8jkdjf

QF-LCA Dataset for Quantum Double-field Model, Game and Application

2024· dataset· en· W6925571463 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueMendeley Data · 2024
Typedataset
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicGeography and Environmental Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Victoria
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEntropy (arrow of time)Coding (social sciences)Field (mathematics)Data collectionState (computer science)Statistical modelQuantum entanglementStatistical hypothesis testingQuantum

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The data on this repository are for the DIB article entitled: "QF-LCA dataset: Quantum field lens coding algorithm for system state simulation and strong predictions" by P. B. Alipour and T. A. Gulliver. The dataset presents an overall preview of the method used for [1, 5] that produce the dataset. QDF measurement data are acquired from IBMQ and QInspire platforms, and stored as an internal data collection, so to compare it to the data collected from measurement variables manually calculated and presented in the QDF articles [1, 3, 4] as *.pdf, *.pptx, *.txt, *.nb, …, and image files. The QDF system model is simulated to generate an external data collection stored on IBMQ, QInspire, or on this repository, as a QDF dataset. The dataset is examined to validate QDF state correlation and entanglement entropy (EE) relative to uncertainty measures (errors) discussed in the QDF’s method article [1]. The data are examined based on QDF’s four-main variables, defined and discussed in the QDF model article [4]. System energy states were profiled as the weighted statistical data for an intelligent decision simulator (IDS) in ‎[1]. This dataset was proposed for a quantum AI (QAI) method to classify states, and make a strong prediction of the next system state. The IDS uses the dataset to further analyze and classify states based on the expected success probability values 〈P_success〉 ≥ 2/3 (doubling the probability space from at least P ≥ 1/3 to P ≥ 2/3), for a strong system state prediction. Other statistical and probability data are based on classical and QDF computations using simulators like Mathematica and IBMQ, uploaded onto this repository, which contains the QDF circuit simulation and its datasets. The file structure is presented in Fig. 1, e.g., *.cq, *.csv, *.htm, *.ipynb, *.png, *.py, …, of the DIB article, each referring to a statistical methodology of QDF vs. classical states by the QFLCA programs. The file content and the corresponding methodology are summarized in Table 1 of the DIB article. The QFLCA datasets are further validated by classifying energy states and generate a QAI map to make a strong prediction based on weighted probabilities of quantum vs. classical states in a quantum game called: “Alice & Bob’s Quantum Doubles” written in Python as a QDF game [1, 4]. The QFLCA website documentation and demo files in *.mp4 under the directory show how to run the game and the QFLCC program. The manual calculation of the QDF model was conducted via Wolfram Alpha online based on the measurement data compared between ES and GS states as a P indicator generated for measurement samples. Small dataset samples denote: a. A particle pair’s energy state in a QDF (different GS states or sublevels of a GS, or see Table 2), b. a particle state in an SF, an ES relative to a GS from (a.) prior to a field transformation, and, c. the expected transformation of fields (ES ←→GS) and ⟨M(P, ψ_ij)⟩, as in Table 2.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Dataset · Consensus signal: Dataset
Teacher disagreement score0.041
Threshold uncertainty score0.137

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0040.002
Research integrity0.0030.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0410.029

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.040
GPT teacher head0.294
Teacher spread0.254 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreDataset

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMendeley DataSame topicGeography and Environmental StudiesFrench-language works237,207