MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6925573969 · doi:10.17632/p6vg4v7f9k

Comprehensive Dataset for Data-Driven Pavement Performance Prediction and Analysis in Flood-Prone Beaumont, Southeast Texas

2025· dataset· en· W6925573969 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueMendeley Data · 2025
Typedataset
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicHigher Education and Employability
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPavement managementIdentification (biology)Predictive modellingFlood mythWork (physics)Resilience (materials science)Data collectionPerformance prediction

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Effective pavement maintenance is vital for the economy, optimal performance, and safety, necessitating a thorough evaluation of pavement conditions such as strength, roughness, and surface distress. Pavement performance indicators significantly influence vehicle safety and ride quality. Recent advancements have focused on leveraging data-driven models to predict pavement performance, aiming to optimize fund allocation and enhance Maintenance and Rehabilitation (M&R) strategies through precise assessment of pavement conditions and defects. A critical prerequisite for these models is access to standardized, high-quality datasets to enhance prediction accuracy in pavement infrastructure management. This data article presents a comprehensive dataset compiled to support pavement performance prediction research, focusing on Southeast Texas, particularly the flood-prone region of Beaumont. The dataset includes pavement and traffic data, meteorological records, flood maps, ground deformation, and topographic indices to assess the impact of load-associated and non-load-associated pavement degradation. Data preprocessing was conducted using ArcGIS Pro, Microsoft Excel, and Python, ensuring the dataset is formatted for direct application in data-driven modeling approaches, including Machine Learning methods. Key contributions of this dataset include facilitating the analysis of climatic and environmental impacts on pavement conditions, enabling the identification of critical features influencing pavement performance, and allowing comprehensive data analysis to explore correlations and trends among input variables. By addressing gaps in input variable selection studies, this dataset supports the development of predictive tools for estimating future maintenance needs and improving the resilience of pavement infrastructure in flood-affected areas. This work highlights the importance of standardized datasets in advancing pavement management systems and provides a foundation for future research to enhance pavement performance prediction accuracy.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Dataset · Consensus signal: Dataset
Teacher disagreement score0.034
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0030.002
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.100
GPT teacher head0.384
Teacher spread0.284 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreDataset

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMendeley DataSame topicHigher Education and EmployabilityFrench-language works237,207