PERKEMBANGAN MADRASAH DI KOTA BANJARMASIN (SEBUAH TINJAUAN HISTORIS DARI TAHUN 2010-2014)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Tulisan ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui perkembangan madrasah di Kota Banjarmasin dari tahun 2010–2014, yang diringkas dari hasil penelitian lapangan (field research) dengan pendekatan kuantitatif-kualitatif. Ada 15 buah madrasah yang dikaji, tersebar pada empat kecamatan, yang bervariasi jenjang (MI, MTs, MA), status (Negeri dan Swasta), organisasi pembinanya (NU dan Muhammadiyah), dan keberadaan lokasinya (satu atap dan tersendiri). Pengumpulan datanya menggunakan kuestioner, wawancara, observasi dan dokumenter. Temuan penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa perkembangan madrasah di kota Banjarmasin selama lima tahun terakhir tidak mengalami perubahan yang berarti. Perkembangan SDM, sarana dan prasarana madrasah masih kurang stabil. Walaupun kelulusan UAN siswanya telah mencapai 100 %, tetapi nilai rata-ratanya belum mendekati nilai kelulusan maksimal. Perkembangan guru dan tenaga kependidikan secara kuantitas agak mengalami stagnasi, tetapi secara kualitas cukup membanggakan. Mayoritas gurunya adalah lulusan S1 dan S2, kecuali pada madrasah swasta di mana masih terdapat guru lulusan SLTA dan Diploma. Kata kunci: madrasah, perkembangan, SDM, sarana dan prasarana
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.015 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".