MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6925590825 · doi:10.17882/101899

Deep-sea observatories images labeled by citizen for object detection algorithms

2024· dataset· en· W6925590825 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueSEANOE · 2024
Typedataset
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicFetal and Pediatric Neurological Disorders
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersHORIZON EUROPE Framework ProgrammeSeventh Framework Programme
KeywordsCitizen scienceAnnotationDirectoryObject detectionHyperspectral imagingUnderwaterClass (philosophy)Object (grammar)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Observatories provide continuous access to both coastal and deep-sea ecosystems, particularly from underwater imaging that is a non-destructive method for examining biodiversity on unprecedented time and space scales. The success of imagery data for scientific purposes leads to new challenges linked to the processing of the exponential amount of data collected, which can be time-consuming and tedious. Annotated images databases are generated by scientists, students, technical staff in laboratories, as well as by citizens through online platforms. They can be used to train machines -through AI models- for automatic processing of images collected by cameras at observatories underwater sites, identifying and analysing fauna and habitats for ecosystem monitoring purposes. In this case, we prepared the citizen science annotations from Deep Sea Spy as a training dataset for YoloV8. Indeed, Deep Sea Spy is a participative science platform launched in 2017, that provides access to images from EMSO-Azores and Ocean Networks Canada observatories for annotation purposes. We also used an expert annotated dataset for model validation. The archive includes: - An Images directory containing 3979 images from both observatories - The raw dataset containing 253323 annotations with 15 labeled classes from Deep Sea Spy : Alvinocaridid shrimp, Brittle star, Buccinoid snail, Bythograeid crab, Cataetyx fish, Chimera fish, Mussel bed, Polynoid worm, Polynoid worms, Pycnogonid (Sea spider), Spider crab, Tubicolous worm bed, Zoarcid fish, Microbial mat, Other fish - The cleaned dataset containing 14967 annotations with the Buccinidae and Bythograeidae classes - The expert dataset used for training validation of the Buccinid class - YoloV8 trained models on Buccinidae and Bythograeidae (.pt files) More information about data format, data cleaning and model training is available in the README file. The full pipeline is freely available on github.com/ai4os-hub/deep-species-detection

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Dataset · Consensus signal: Dataset
Teacher disagreement score0.041
Threshold uncertainty score0.082

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.003
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.011

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.270
Teacher spread0.255 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreDataset

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSEANOESame topicFetal and Pediatric Neurological DisordersFrench-language works237,207