The effect of tea herb cream on wound healing satisfaction and episiotomy pain intensity in primiparous women (double-blind clinical trial)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Introduction: Episiotomy is one of the most common surgeries in midwifery. Episiotomy wound healing can lead to perineal infection and pain, and affects mothers' satisfaction with childbirth. Tea herb with analgesic and anti-inflammatory properties can be effective on mothers' satisfaction with wound healing process. Therefore, the present study was conducted with aim to investigate the effect of tea herb cream on wound healing satisfaction and episiotomy pain intensity in primiparous women. Methods: This double blind randomized clinical trial study was conducted in 2014 on 100 eligible primiparous women referred to Noorani hospital of Talesh. The participants were randomly allocated into two groups: A (drug) and B (placebo). After delivery, the subjects used the creams on episiotomy site twice a day for 10 days. They completed the researcher's questionnaires about satisfaction with treatment on the 10th day after delivery. Data were analyzed by SPSS software (version 19) and Mann-Whitney, independent t test and fisher exact test. P< 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: The level of satisfaction in the intervention group with mean rating of 73.93 was higher than the control group with mean rating of 25.07. According to the Mann-Whitney test, the relationship between the two groups in terms of the level of satisfaction was significant (P<0.001) Conclusion: Tea herb cream is effective on the satisfaction of pain improvement and wound healing.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.041 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".