Error Magnetic Field due to the Median Plane Asymmetry and Its Applications in the Cyclotron
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cyclotrons have a median plane symmetric structure. But the pole’s geometric error and the unevenly magnetized soft iron give rise to non-zero asymmetrical fields in the geometric median plane. The asymmetric field can shift the vertical position of the beam. Moreover, The error of the tilted median plane can be the driving force when the tunes pass through coupling resonances. In this paper, we take the TRIUMF 500 MeV cyclotron as an example to study the asymmetric field resulting from imperfect median plane symmetry. An approach due to M. Gordon, and a highly accurate compact finite differentiation method are used to investigate the historical field survey data, which reveals redundancy in the survey data. The redundancy was used in this study to correct the error in the measurement data. Further, the median plane asymmetry field could be manipulated using trim coils or harmonic coils with top and bottom coil currents in opposite directions (’Br-mode’). Using the created asymmetric field, we improved the vertical tune measurement method to investigate the linear coupling resonance in TRIUMF 500 MeV cyclotron. Eventually, the coupling resonance is corrected and avoided using the available harmonic coils and trim coils.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".