MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6925905552 · doi:10.18739/a2pc2t997

Consolidated surface moisture budget measurements from high-latitude flux tower sites at daily, weekly, and monthly time periods, 1995-2019.

2022· dataset· en· W6925905552 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueUC Santa Barbara · 2022
Typedataset
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicDisaster Management and Resilience
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEvapotranspirationLongwaveShortwave radiationPrecipitationWind speedMoistureVegetation (pathology)ShortwaveAtmospheric temperature

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This dataset contains in situ measurements of the atmosphere-surface moisture fluxes (precipitation, evapotranspiration) and the associated atmospheric drivers of evapotranspiration at 45 terrestrial sites in northern high latitudes. For each site, the raw measurements for 30-minute periods have been aggregated into daily, weekly and monthly averages of the atmospheric variables and daily totals of precipitation (P) and evapotranspiration (ET). The dataset is intended to facilitate diagnostic studies of the variations of the surface moisture balance over timescales of days to seasons. All sites have at least 3 years of data and are distributed as follows: Canada (10), Alaska (17), Russia (8), Finland (2), Sweden (3), Svalbard (1), Greenland (3), Iceland (1). Atmospheric variables include air temperature (2-meter), relative humidity, wind speed, sensible heat flux, ground heat flux, net shortwave radiation and net longwave radiation. Useful data are generally limited to the warm season (April/May through September/October). An auxiliary file includes the key descriptors for each site: AmeriFlux/FluxNet site name and identifier, latitude-longitude, years of data coverage, dominant vegetation type, and the presence or absence of permafrost.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Dataset · Consensus signal: Dataset
Teacher disagreement score0.079
Threshold uncertainty score0.158

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.005
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0210.019

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.263
Teacher spread0.247 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreDataset

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUC Santa BarbaraSame topicDisaster Management and ResilienceFrench-language works237,207