MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W6926017859 · doi:10.20381/ruor-7699

The molecular mechanisms regulating the expression of acetylcholinesterase in cholinergic neurons.

2000· article· en· W6926017859 on OpenAlexvenueno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueLibrary and Archives Canada (Government of Canada) · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMicrobial Natural Products and Biosynthesis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAcetylcholinesteraseCholine acetyltransferaseCholinergicAcetylcholineAchéPopulationNeurotransmitterNeuromuscular junction

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Acetylcholinesterase (AChE) is responsible for the rapid hydrolysis of acetylcholine into acetic acid and choline, thereby ensuring precise temporal control of synaptic transmission. The role of AChE has been well documented with respect to the neuromuscular junction where it performs this classic function. However, it has recently been discovered that AChE is also expressed in a variety of non-cholinergic tissues such as haematopoietic cells and selected populations of neurons. The role of the enzyme in non-cholinergic neuronal cells is currently unknown and its regulation in this population of cells has been generally overlooked. In this study, we established a cell model to study the developmental and trophic regulation of AChE in neuronal cells. In addition, we examined the regulation of the acetylcholine-synthesizing enzyme, choline acetyltransferase (ChAT) to elucidate the relationship between the two cholinergic enzymes. In a first series of experiments, we tested several hybrid cell lines for AChE activity. Next, we examined the developmental regulation of AChE and ChAT using NSC-34 motoneurons. (Abstract shortened by UMI.)

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.020
Threshold uncertainty score0.040

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.003
GPT teacher head0.153
Teacher spread0.150 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueLibrary and Archives Canada (Government of Canada)→Same topicMicrobial Natural Products and Biosynthesis→French-language works237,207→