Le cadre juridique et administratif des plans conjoints de mise en marché des produits agricoles au Québec
Bibliographic record
Abstract
To assure better marketing conditions for their products, the agricultural producers of Quebec and the other Canadian [Provinces have used the Marketing Joint Plan formula. It is a rather new mechanism that has been added to the other marketing systems (such as the cooperatives) at the disposal of producers, so that they can themselves exercice a better control on the marketing of their products. When a group of producers want to organize a plan, there is ordinarily a referendum held amongst all interested producers. Jt the required majority approves the proposed plan, which is in fact the charter giving the required powers, the plan binds all producers of the designated sector, being thus compulsive for the minority which has not accepted it. The plan is then administered by a Board of producers only, and it establishes the marketing conditions of the product involved by means of a collective agreement negociated with the interested persons or, if not, by compulsary and final arbitration. The Board may also fix most of these conditions by Regulations, and it can establish a central agency for the sale of the product; it can also determine production and marketing quotas. The Board must of course take into account the economic situation and the legal framework of the Federal Canadian constitution. The Producers' Board is also under the supervision of a Public Body, which must settle disputes and assure that the general interest of all the producers, the rights of intermediaries and consumers are protected.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.009 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.011 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.025 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".