MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6926166585 · doi:10.25318/1110005901-fra

Mobilité du revenu sur cinq ans

2025· dataset· fr· W6926166585 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueStatistics Canada Dissemination · 2025
Typedataset
Languagefr
FieldMedicine
TopicMicrobial Natural Products and Biosynthesis
Canadian institutionsGovernment of Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsResearch methodologyWork (physics)Mercantilism

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Les tableaux contiennent des statistiques décrivant comment les revenus des déclarants varient, soit par rapport aux revenus qu'ils ont réalisés dans le passé, soit par rapport aux revenus réalisés par les autres déclarants. Le premier groupe de statistiques illustre la mobilité absolue du revenu tandis que le second groupe illustre la mobilité relative du revenu. Ce tableau fournit des statistiques sur la mobilité du revenu sur cinq ans. Le tableau 11-10-0061 fournit des statistiques sur la mobilité d'un an.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Dataset · Consensus signal: Dataset
Teacher disagreement score0.791
Threshold uncertainty score0.416

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.005
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0210.015

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.242
Teacher spread0.237 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreDataset

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueStatistics Canada DisseminationSame topicMicrobial Natural Products and BiosynthesisFrench-language works237,207